Any reports from mainstream sources claiming there is ZERO evidence to suggest SARS CoV2 may have been lab cultured is false. Evidence has been mounting by many different virologists and other professionals for a few months, however sections of the mainstream media, public health, many of our politicians and other community / faith leaders simply refuse to acknowledge it is out there.
Does that mean these other virologists are 100% correct? Not necessarily and we will see how their conclusions stand over time. However, we can for 100% certainty say that there is “evidence” being published and publicly stated, suggesting the mainstream narrative about SARS CoV2 may be wrong. This would suggest that any Media Outlet, Public Health Officer, Scientists, or Politician claiming that there is ZERO evidence of lab creation is either unaware to the existence of this data, or is willfully ignoring it. Many of these mainstream outlets are censoring and/or deleting data from many world renown professionals and making it much more difficult for the general public to access balanced information. All evidence should be presented, with scientific debate in the public square.
When politicians, doctors, media and community / faith leaders are saying they are looking at a balanced perspective related to this “Pandemic” and then at the same time say that these differing narratives are “quackery”, “conspiracy theory”, or “extreme” then they are NOT being balanced. They are also in many instances not allowing the public balanced information and are in fact shaming those who present it.
Another professional study into origin and human transmission of SARS CoV2 has been recently published and this time through the Cornell University trademark arXiv. The study published by Australians: Sakshi Piplani, Puneet Kumar Singh, David A. Winkler and Nikolai Petrovsky is now public and awaiting peer review. These professionals, like many others, are suggesting that the Spike Proteins of the SARS CoV2 virus show that the virus may have been cultured in a way to make it more easily transmissible to human cells through the ACE2 Receptor. They are also suggesting that these very same proteins making it easier to infect human cells, at the same time make the virus more difficult to infect animal cells. The report is long but worth the read. Here is two small excerpts from the report:
“Although bats carry many coronaviruses including SARS-CoV, a relative of SARS-CoV-2, direct evidence for existence of SARS-CoV-2 in bats has not been found. As highlighted by our data, the binding strength of SARS-CoV-2 for bat ACE2 is considerably lower than for human ACE2, suggesting that even if SARS-CoV-2 did originally arise from a bat precursor it must later have adapted its spike protein to optimise its binding to human ACE2. There is no current explanation for how, when or where this might have happened.”
“Notably, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein had the highest overall binding energy for human ACE2, greater than all the other tested species including bat, the postulated source of the virus. This indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is a highly adapted human pathogen”
Link to Cornell University (arXiv) site : https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06199
Link to direct report PDF : https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.06199.pdf
These are not the only professionals who have reported very similar conclusions in the past few months. The famous Virologist Nobel Prof. Dr. Montagnier, who discovered HIV/AIDS, came out publicly in this televised newscast to give his expert findings and conclusions regarding the SARS CoV2 virus. He strongly suggests that this virus has been professionally modified to include Spike Proteins not naturally found in Coronavirus from bats. He also claims to have found trace evidence of HIV in the Novel Coronavirus. The video posted below is from a live news interview and is in French. You will need to turn on the YouTube subtitles using the viewer settings wheel.
During the interview, Dr. Montagnier refers to an Indian Paper where scientists came to the same conclusions he did regarding “uncanny” traces of HIV in the SARS CoV 2 virus. I have pasted below a direct link to this report:
Link to report: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full